Senators demand Transocean investigation: DID THEY KNOW THIS WOULD HAPPEN?
Transocean, according to the letter, also says it will make a $270 million profit on the insurance policy for the rig. And the senators claim the rig was insured for more than it was worth.
Mass evacuation bus seen in Brunswick
Planned Event or False Flag? You be the judge, but if you feel how I feel after making this video.
Survivor's account of the Deepwater Horizon explosion. Information on oversight and safety before the blast.
For backstory on second half, read Jason Leopold's Whistleblower: BP Risks More Massive Catastrophes in Gulf
There is no end in sight to this oil volcano tragedy. It is so frustrating that technology does exist to minimize the impact of this event, however is not being used. The question you have to ask yourself is, "Why?" Is it a diversion to our failing local and world economies? Was it done on purpose, a false flag or planned event?
From Krispy
Hey Gaz :)
I have 2 things for you :D
I have been busy reading GLP and shurning what I thought was important and should be presented to the people ..
as a link to the article (1) or as a blog (2)...
Take time to read it and let me know what you think abou that 2nd piece ...
It took mea lot of time ...lol...
Please correct my grammar ... :P
And I do not yet have a toepasselijke titel for that second piece of work ... could you help me?
1`
check this out
As part of the ongoing federal response to the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, EPA today established a website to inform the public about the spill’s impact on the environment and the health of nearby residents. The website – http://www.epa.gov/bpspill – will contain data from EPA’s ongoing air monitoring along with other information about the agency’s activities in the region. Also today, Administrator Jackson joined Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Neapolitan and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to tour the region. The Administrator will spend the next 36 hours visiting with community groups and meeting EPA staff responding to the spill.
Additional information on the broader response from the U.S. Coast Guard and other responding agencies is available at: http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com
2`
* THE DEEPWATER HORIZON DISASTER
The Horizon had what was called a catastrophic accident about 6 months ago. I saw nothing at all explaining what happened. Maybe this gusher 5 miles away was that accident. I also suspect pressures they didn't expect as the culprit.
Maybe that is why the rush of BP officials to ignore safety, and make that final bad decision before the rig blew. Cover
**** watch this video ****
it's an interview of Mike Williams (chief electronics engineer on the Deepwater Horizon) ... was recorded by 60 minutes ....
on the video from about 4 minutes into the footage, Mike Williams says that they were drilling a well nearby and because they were told to 'speed things up', the well fractured and they abandoned that well and started drilling a new well nearby
so perhaps this is the well that is nearby and leaking heavily?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0onXmlFgF8I
- On a thread here someone posted that DWH drilled in an ancillary location to the current well. They experienced (their term) a major catastrophic event, sealed the hole and moved on.... no doubt to the current location and likely without actually sealing the hole but beginning a subsea dispersant operation to hide it.
They obviously did not seal it, otherwise : why cant they SEAL THIS ONE .... ?
- And the only reason they admitted the DWH explosion and massive damage in April, is because there were civilian WITNESSES!
They couldn't pretend nothing happened this time. Their fuck up was too big, men died and fishermen in the area saw it blow.. people on the coast saw it.
No hiding it this time, BP.
They screwed up, pulled up equipment and slithered away to another location.
There are probably more untold 'leaks' out there.
Why should they care what happens to the ecosystem? they only car about $$$$$$$$
*ARE THE DWH AND BP BLOWOUTS CONNECTED ?
Doing anything drastic to this hole they've been playing with for a month might make the other hole they have created far worse.
What happens to the other leak with what they planning to do with this one ?
Maybe they are connected to one another ....
- The announcer says something like "looks like BP has even bigger problems (than the leaking riser) several miles away."
Okay, if something is leaking several miles away, and they have stated 5 or 6 miles away in the past, how is that BP's problem?
What are they saying exactly?
According to Simmons there is a minor leak at the wellhead/riser and there is a major leak 5 or 6 miles away.
How does the major leak line up with the blowout leak at the wellhead and why does the other leak have anything to do with BP?
How about this for a guess: they caused another blowout while drilling one of the relief wells.
THAT would make it BP'S problem, wouldn't it/
They would be drilling the relief wells about 5 or 6 miles away from the first well.
The relief well blowout and now there are two gushers 6 miles apart.
I bet that's it, I think what is coming to light is that the other gusher was also drilled by BP and abandoned to try again 5 miles away....
- Actually they have opened it up way faster coz they were ordered so.
So how would a gusher 5 or 6 miles away be BP's problem? It would if it was in some way related to the current smaller one.
That spells relief well, which is probably spewing Moor oil rig now then the original well ... and they have absolutely no idea what to do with 2 gushing wells !
The reason why they are letting some guy onto national news programs coz they are floating this information and trying to figure out what kind of response it is getting ...GLP is probably one of the testing grounds... ;)
- They are saying that the leak from the riser pipe attached to the BOP is just a minor leak and there is a larger gusher 5 miles away?
Is it possible that the methane shock opened up fissures in the ocean floor then, since there was no (known) oil leak prior to April 20.?
If so we are in big trouble
And what about all the oil BP has been hiding under water with the dispersant's ???
* THE OIL CAVERN, THE NUKE AND THE STABILITY
It appears that the whole area is unstable - imagine the sudden increase in pressure inside the oil cavity caused by the pressure blast of the nuke!
How big is that cavity? Do we know anything about that for SURE or is this again "just-messing-around" ?
Besides, we don't have a clue how big and connected this oil-cavern is !!!!
According to the experts the nuke would just fuse (melt) all the rock around it into a big new rock. Leak stopped, so they hope ...
But what about the effects of the bast ? The traveling frequencies of the explosion could trigger more even weaker parts in the seafloor and
causing by this a chain of reactions in the months to come ...
The pressure of the explosion MUST go somewhere! The line of least resistance will be where it goes so if they don't have it right - it WILL go wrong!
I suppose it COULD close "the" leak as if only one. Or it could open a hundred new fissures. We don't know and they don't either. There are people in the world who think they can harness the Earth and bend it to their will. They might be in for a big surprise.
- Google what happens when you mix brake fluid/oil + chlorine+ water. It basically reacts in a very volatile manner, and fizzes up like what happens when you shake a full bottle of coke.
As the reservoir of oil gets depleted over the past few years, something must go into the vacuum of the oil reservoir to replace the volume, and that has more than likely been sea-water. Chloride, the main proponent of chlorine, naturally occurs in salt .. and obviously salt is a main component of seawater.
So what may be happening, is the seawater component reached critical mass, and as it mixes with the oil, as well as possible naturally occurring chlorine, the pool of oil underneath has been kicked into a violent, fizzing-up globule of very high pressure. Let me summarize it for you: "Diet-Coke & Mentos" ....
Hence more fissures, and probably there is some serious reinforcing going on at other well-heads right now as well.
They are talking about putting a nuke in the bedrock, somewhat next to the tube that brings the oil up, then detonating the nuke
so that it pushes the rock over and collapses the tube. But where is the "bed rock" in the Geo-data from the Gulf?
Certainly "the sediment" is thick, but sediment does NOT equal "bed rock!"
- Nice or chocking info ..
Think about it :
"Concrete under 5000' of water trying to hold in pressurized Gas/Oil fails and the gas/oil comes rushing back up the bore hole. Don't remember the exact pressure but believe it was something around 16,000 psi. Environmental Disaster.
Now if they can't contain 16,000 psi of oil/gas from coming back up a borehole ... how in the heck are they going to get the NEW Borehole under 5000 feet of water filled such as to contain a nuclear explosion?
Everyone knows that water turns to steam and expands as it gets heated ... Right? That is the old theory behind the Steam Engine.
Many of you are probably also aware that "water injection" was also utilized as a way to INCREASE the power of the big compression gasoline engines (real world example: the big rotary aircraft engines of WW2 and the 1940's - 1950's) over that of just using gasoline in the cylinders alone since it had a higher expansion coefficient when heated than the gasoline explosion alone did. HUGE expansion coefficient of water when it is flash converted to steam.
No matter how they drill this well down there is going to be water intrusion along the drill string, if not inside the drill string then along and outside the outer walls. This thing is going to be drilled 5000 feet underwater and that water is just naturally going to force it's way down along the edges of the drill string as a path is opened for it.
Even "IF" they can concrete the drill string such that the nuclear explosion is contained and doesn't come back up (not even sure they can do that with the type of concrete they would have to use) that still doesn't do anything about the water that is now in the surrounding rock around the drill string and got there when the well and drill string was being drilled/put in.
Massive and quick heating of that water intrusion column when they set off the explosion is going to "fracture" that surrounding rock just like drillers "fracture" rock when they are looking to increase oil output in old tired wells. The expansion coefficient of water is such that rock cracking is going to move right up that water column of the drill string for thousands of feet, or at least until the "heat" being transferred up is not sufficient to flash convert that water to steam.
As I have pointed out previously I am old enough to remember the underground tests (and yes even a couple of the above ground ones) out west ... and in that dry climate WITH NO WATER in the rock to assist in the fracturing of the rock above the explosion level in a number of the underground tests there WAS radiation leakage and outgassing directly out of the ground at the test site at the time of the explosion.
In the DRY western climate in some underground nuclear tests rock was being fractured ALL THE WAY TO THE SURFACE when they fired those nukes. Not in every case, but in enough of them that one knows that it is not only possible but has almost regularly happened. OH ... in in those cases there was NO pressure of something additional under there even trying to get out!!
NOW some expect wants us to believe that with unavoidable water intrusion into the drill hole ... which will accentuate any "fracturing" that would occur even in a DRY climate ... is there little risk of that happening here, with the oil and gas under enormous pressure to find a path out after the explosion?
If there had been oil/gas under some of those underground nuclear test sites back in the 50's - 60's after that rock was "fractured" by the test, since the test itself obviously cracked/"fractured" the rock all the way to the surface I daresay we would have seen oil/gas leaking out afterwards."
So have the experts even thought once that the very second that the bomb goes off that the entire seabed in that area could be fractured beyond repair?
Did they even consider that at this point there's likely many fissures adjacent to the well area?
If they fracture the entire complex under the sea floor completely, and vaporize unknown billions of gallons of contaminated sea water ... Could they quite possibly cause a catastrophic collapse miles down? Instant tsunami at the least? never mind the fallout...
We know that the subsurface structure down there reaches pretty far inland, .. And that the area is prone to earthquakes.
- An other piece of info why we/they should be cautious !
1. In the mid-ocean, the thickness of the crust can be as little as 5 km. The entire crust occupies just 1% of the Earth's volume.
The crust is composed of a variety of igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rocks gathered together into tectonic plates. These plates float above the Earth's mantle, and it's believed that convection of rock in the mantle causes the plates to slide around.
2. Oceanic crust:
As the name already suggests, this crust is below the oceans. There, the crust is 4-7 miles (6-11 km) thick. The rocks of the oceanic crust are very young compared with the rocks of the continental crust. The rocks of the oceanic crust are not older than 200 million years. The material of which the oceanic crust consists is for the greater part tholeiitic basalt (this is basalt without olivine). Basalt has a dark, fine and gritty volcanic structure. It is formed out of very liquid lava, which cools off quickly. The grains are so small that they are only visible under a microscope. The average density of the oceanic crust is 3g/cm³.
3. In many respects the geology of the Gulf of Mexico is better understood than other comparable marginal seas due primarily to its long history of drilling and reflection seismic acquisition by the petroleum industry. However, the petroleum accumulations and thick Tertiary section that attract industry also restrict scientific ocean drilling. To date only the carbonate margin of the southern Gulf and Quaternary fans in the deep eastern basin have been targeted. Discovering new details of the nature and timing of the opening of the Gulf basin, therefore, presents a considerable challenge. The goal of this ongoing study is to determine whether the opening of the Gulf of Mexico is a predictable manifestation of the planetary-scale super swell-related mantle stresses that drive the movements of major plates and to evaluate implications for Gulf of Mexico petroleum systems.
Predicting micro plate kinematics within the poorly defined boundary zone that separates North Atlantic and South Atlantic spreading is pivotal in this analysis. It is postulated that the movements of continental micro plates in the Gulf of Mexico are driven by mantle stresses that moved first North America and then South America away from Africa.
Outcropping and drilled Mesozoic strata of the Gulf rim, the presence of buried plume-related alkaline basaltic volcanoes of middle and Late Cretaceous age, and the geometric requirement that the Yucatan Platform be rotated into a position along the Texas - Louisiana margin to allow the reassembly of Pang ea are the principal constraints on the origin of the Gulf of Mexico. There is general agreement among researchers that the opening of the western basin of the Gulf of Mexico reflects the counterclockwise rotation of a Yucatan micro plate. Following recently published paleomagnetic evidence the Chiapas portion of the Maya Block is treated as a separate micro plate in this study. It is recognized that the rotation of a Yucatan micro plate about the relatively well-known Euler rotation poles that opened the North Atlantic Ocean cannot account for the most probable trajectory of Yucatan. Published opening solutions designed to provide an ideal Yucatan trajectory are purely kinematic, not addressing the implications of a unique Gulf of Mexico stress field on planetary-scale mantle processes that drive plate motions.
* EARTHQUAKES
- Consider the recent earthquakes involving these plates : the area is unstable!
"The New Madrid Fault Zone" runs through the Gulf of Mexico.
Do we want to be nuking around that?
What about the Methane Hydrates?
** field evidence volcanic rift GOM !!! **
http://www.utdallas.edu/~rjstern/pdfs/MickusGeology09.pdf
EQ?
As I watched the live feeds yesterday -- something happened and the BOP/Riser started to shake -- almost as if there was a small quake.
Two Rovers who were holding on to the BOP -- backed off very quickly.
Many people saw that riser pipe was bouncing around in a big way -- and the plumes from the bent riser were noticeably different during this time.
If these are indeed tremors or quakes, we should our hearts ...
Is it possible that this "oil cloud" is aiding in the overall deception of something far more insidious than even these devastating oil volcanoes ranging from fixable to totally out of control?
What else besides oil and methane is escaping thru these gigantic vents out of the earth?
This whole story is clearly connected in more ways than meet the eye and even what does meet the eye has been horribly obscured/skewed, but to what end and purpose?
We have to be aware that this is not just an accident,
it needs thorough thinking on how and what and why.
This is not only economical, nor natural, nor evaluational ... it is going to touch every one of us living on earth.
It is time that humankind comes to the consciousness that this can not stay beneath the sea surface like a lot of the oil by the added chemicals.
We all deserve to know and should care about revealing the truth, and taking responsibility for our Earth ... not by exploiting here, but by taking CARE !
I CARE !
The Big Wobble Website
The Big Wobble Forum










